When we sit in Washington and debate foreign policy, its like a risk game, or its all about us, or the human beings disappear from the decisions. But he lived in a place where he was surrounded by people who had either perpetrated those acts — and by the way, may not have felt great about that — or else knew someone who was a victim. I dont think theres ever been an American president who had an experience like that at a young age of what power. Wil, see more synonyms on m auxiliary verb, present singular 1st person will, 2nd will or (Archaic) wilt, 3rd will, present plural will; past singular 1st person would, 2nd would or (Archaic) wouldst, 3rd would, past plural would; past participle (Obsolete) wold or would; imperative. Am (is, are, etc.) about or going to: I will be there tomorrow. She will see you at dinner. Am (is, are, etc.) disposed or willing to: people will do right. Am (is, are, etc.) expected or required to: you will report to the principal at once.
Mother s day, story : Mothers day
Those are matters for the negotiators and area specialists. Rather, it derived from his own sense of the urgency of radically reorienting American policy in the middle east in order to make the prospect of American involvement in the regions future wars a lot less likely. When i asked whether the prospect of this same kind of far-reaching spin campaign being run by a different administration is something that presentation scares him, he admitted that it does. I mean, Id prefer a sober, reasoned public debate, after which members of Congress reflect and take a vote, he said, shrugging. Getting Rhodes to speak directly about the man whose gestalt he channels is a bit like asking someone to look into a mirror while describing someone elses face. The Obama he talks about in public is, in part, a character that he has helped to create — based on a real person, of course — and is embedded in story lines that he personally constructs and manages. At the same time, he believes very deeply in Obama, the man and the president, and in the policies that he has helped to structure and sell on his behalf. Obamas particular revulsion against a certain kind of global power politics is a product, Rhodes suggests, of his having been raised in southeast Asia. Indonesia was a place where your interaction at that time with power was very intimate, right? Tens or hundreds of thousands of people had just been killed. Power was not some abstract thing, he muses.
We drove them crazy, he said of the deals opponents. Yet Rhodes bridled at the suggestion that blood there has been anything deceptive about the way that the agreement itself was sold. Look, with Iran, in a weird way, these are state-to-state issues. Theyre agreements between governments. Yes, i would prefer that it turns out that rouhani and Zarif — mohammad javad Zarif, Irans foreign minister — are real reformers who are going to be steering this country into the direction that I believe it can go in, because their public. But we are not betting on that. In fact, Rhodess passion seems to derive not from any investment in the technical specifics of sanctions or centrifuge arrays, or any particular optimism about the future course of Iranian politics and society.
In the spring of last year, legions of arms-control experts began popping up at think tanks and on social media, and then became key sources for hundreds of often-clueless reporters. We created an echo chamber, he admitted, when i asked him to explain the onslaught of freshly minted experts cheerleading for the deal. They were saying things that validated what we essay had given them to say. When I suggested that all this dark metafictional play seemed a bit removed from rational debate over Americas future role in the world, Rhodes nodded. In the absence of rational discourse, we are going to discourse the expletive out of this, he said. We had test drives to know who was going to be able to carry our message effectively, and how to use outside groups like ploughshares, the Iran Project and whomever else. So we knew the tactics that worked. He is proud of the way he sold the Iran deal.
Here are some examples of weak and strong analysis/concluding observation sections: Analysis that is really evidence (weak experts at duke universitys School of Medicine agree that soy milk is a healthy choice. Analysis that doesnt relate evidence to claim and thesis statement (weak soy milk therefore prevents disease. Analysis that explains why evidence supports the claim and why this is important to the papers thesis (strong The disease-fighting and health-promoting components of soy milk have the potential to change peoples health and to improve their lives by affecting both cholesterol and weight. This makes soy milk an important factor in heart health, so people should consider switching to soy milk. Malley is a particularly keen observer of the changing art of political communication; his father, simon Malley, who was born in cairo, edited the politics magazine Afrique asie and proudly provided a platform for Fidel Castro and Yasir Arafat, in the days when the leaders. The Iran experience was the place where i saw firsthand how policy, politics and messaging all had to be brought together, and I think that Ben is really at the intersection of all three, malley says. He reflects and he shapes at the same time. As Malley and representatives of the State department, including Wendy Sherman and Secretary of State john Kerry, engaged in formal negotiations with the Iranians, to ratify details of a framework that had already been agreed upon, Rhodess war room did its work on Capitol Hill.
Mother s day,"s For Mother : Mothersdaycelebration
During this time, all of us also lost quite a lumbar bit of weight. Evidence that is specific (stronger evidence two years ago, my mothers ldl bad cholesterol level was 242, and her hdl good cholesterol was 37, so she was considered "high risk." Since she was hesitant to take cholesterol-lowering medications, her internist suggested that she try. He believed that it was worthwhile to try this before placing her on medications. In order to support her, our entire family started drinking soy milk and walking in the evenings. After six months, her ldl dropped to 198 and her hdl rose to 45, which was a dramatic improvement. Our family all lost quite a bit of weight, as well: my mother lost fifteen pounds and my father lost more than twenty. Her doctor tells her that if she continues this lifestyle change, she will significantly reduce her chance of heart problems in the future.
The second example not only contains more information, but it presents it in a believable and interesting way. By including specific details, the author appears to be an "expert so the evidence is more persuasive. Analysis, your analysis or concluding observation is your way of "wrapping up" the information presented in your paragraph. It should explain why the evidence supports your claim and why this supports the main thesis in your paper. Its important to end with your own analysis of the information rather than with evidence. This keeps you "in control" of the paper; if you end with evidence, youre emphasizing ideas from your sources rather than your own. The reader relies on you to analyze the evidence in the paragraph and explain why it matters to the claim and to the rest of the paper.
Soybeans are "complete protein" because they contain all eight amino acids (Collins 1). Collins points out that "as little as 25 mg of soy protein a day may decrease levels of ldl cholesterol and Triglycerides" (1) and this may reduce the chance of heart disease. Since soy is a "low-glycemic index" food, it may help people trying to lose weight "feel more satisfied and less hungry until your next meal, which is beneficial for weight management and control" (1). Evidence that includes information from a variety of sources (stronger evidence scientists believe that soy milk has the potential to balance cholesterol levels in humans: "A diet with significant soy protein reduces Total Cholesterol, ldl cholesterol (the "bad" cholesterol) and triglycerides" (Tsang 1). Since soy milk is one of the easiest ways to incorporate soy into the diet, this is a good choice for people seeking to lower their ldl and triglycerides. Soy milk also may reduce the potential for heart disease.
Asian countries, which traditionally consume more soy protein, have a much lower incidence of heart disease and many types of cancer (Berkeley 4). The benefits of soy arent just limited to the heart, however. Soy milk and cheese made from soy milk may help with weight loss since they contain less saturated fat than regular dairy products, although they contain about the same amounts of fat as reduced-fat milk and cheese (Collins 1). Some researchers even believe that soy may help to stimulate the metabolism (duke 4). Note that the second example seems more "balanced because the author demonstrates knowledge of the subject and incorporates several expert opinions to back up the claim. Sometimes your assignment will not require you to conduct research into secondary sources, and you may need to use your own ideas or experiences as evidence to back up your claims. Try to be very specific. If you include detailed examples and explanations, your evidence will be more interesting and more persuasive to the reader, and you will seem like more of an authority on your topic: evidence that isnt specific (weak evidence my mothers cholesterol was bad, and the doctor. Our family started eating more soy and soy milk, and her levels eventually got much better.
Turnitin - official Site
In a paper that incorporates research from secondary sources, your evidence may include information from articles, books, electronic sources, or any of the research you gathered. The evidence may take the form of a direct"tion, paraphrased material, statistical data, or any other information from one of your sources that helps to support your claim. Try to incorporate information from several sources into each paragraph. Avoid just "retelling" the information from a single author or article. Aim to represent a variety of opinions and views. This way, youre not just telling the reader what one expert says, but youre explaining how your claim is supported by research from several experts in your field. Here are some examples of weak and strong evidence sections: evidence that includes information from one source (weak evidence according working to collins, soy milk has more protein than cows milk, and doesnt contain the saturated fat or cholesterol (1).
milk help to protect the body from disease and promote good health, so soy is a better choice. The first example is weak because it presents facts that cannot be disputed; the second example is stronger because it uses those facts to make an argument. As you can see, the second example not only tells the reader that soy contains healthy isoflavones and nutrients, but it also argues that these facts make soy milk a better choice. To evaluate whether your paper contains effective claims in each paragraph, read only the first sentence of each paragraph. You should be able to follow the development of the papers thesis by reading only the claim sentences. These should tell you the main points that you are making throughout the paper. Your claims will also prepare the reader for the second section of your paragraph. Evidence, this is how you support, or back up, your claims. The evidence will help to "prove" each claim to the reader.
Just as in the thesis statement, your topic sentences should be debatable. In other words, they should be arguable claims that you will try to "prove" with your evidence. If you get stuck developing these claims, try to think of reasons why your thesis is true. Each claim should be a reason why the reader should believe your papers main idea. For example, perhaps youre writing an essay about whether people should drink soy milk instead of cows milk. Your "reasons" for this might include health benefits, environmental benefits, cost-effectiveness, and resume safety, so you would focus one paragraph on each of these topics. One of the most common mistakes is to present a topic sentence that is actually an observation of facts or a description of events rather than an active argument. When you make a claim based on a fact or event in your topic sentence, you arent presenting an arguable claim that you can back up with your evidence in that paragraph.
Analysis of poem, phenomenal, woman by, maya, angelou, owlcation
Effective paragraphs are important in all types of writing. Your paragraphs guide your reader through the paper by helping to explain, substantiate, and support your thesis statement or argument. Each paragraph should discuss one major point or idea. An effective paragraph has three parts: claim, evidence, warming and analysis. Claim, this is also sometimes called a topic sentence. This will be your way of announcing the main focus of your paragraph; it should tell the reader what your paragraph will be about. It may be helpful to think of your claims as mini arguments that support the papers main argument or thesis.